<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/feeds/articlecomments?arxId=1478-7954-3-8&amp;format=rss&amp;version=&amp;quantity=">
        <title>Article Comments - 'Psychometric properties of the CDC Symptom Inventory for assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome'</title>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8/comments</link>
        <description>The latest comments on the article 'Psychometric properties of the CDC Symptom Inventory for assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome'</description>
        <dc:date>2007-07-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8/comments#284565">
        <title>Observations on apparent changes in methods of assessing symptoms</title>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8/comments#284565</link>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;I notice that the &lt;i&gt;&quot;Symptom Inventory collects information about the presence, frequency, and intensity of .. symptoms during the month preceding the interview&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However the Fukuda et al &apos;94 definition [1] is supposed to look for &lt;i&gt;&quot;the concurrent occurrence of four or more of the following symptoms, all of which must have persisted or recurred during 6 or more consecutive months of illness and must not have predated the fatigue&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Was there a particular reason why a time frame of one month was chosen?  This would suggest that relatively short-lived symptoms would be counted.  If the reasoning was that asking people detailed questions about symptom severity and frequency over a longer period would might not be as accurate, perhaps a two-stage question could be asked: firstly asking whether symptoms &quot;have persisted or recurred during 6 or more consecutive months of illness&quot; and then asking a more detailed question about frequency and intensity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also see no mention of the requirement, that was in the initial definition [1], that the symptoms didn&apos;t predate the fatigue.  Again, if this is a change, it would seem to risk reducing the specificity of the symptom criteria (i.e. increasing the chences that symptoms from other causes are counted) so perhaps again a yes/no question would be good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tom Kindlon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[1] Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A: The chronic fatigue syndrome; a comprehensive approach to its definition and study.  Ann Int Med 1994, 121:953-959.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <dc:creator>Tom Kindlon</dc:creator>
                <dc:date>2007-07-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8/comments#285566">
        <title>More symptoms could be added to a CFS Symptom Inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/3/1/8/comments#285566</link>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Many would feel that the 8 symptoms used in the CDC &apos;94 definition [1] were chosen in a somewhat arbitrary fashion; so it is to be welcomed that the CDC itself has started to look beyond these symptoms with the CDC CFS Symptom Inventory.  The idea of a Short Form of the CDC Symptom Inventory is also interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, it is not clear to me where the extra symptoms that are on the CDC CFS Symptom Inventory came from.  For example, I didn&apos;t see some of the symptoms listed in Reeves et al [2].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2001, De Becker et al [3] published data on the symptoms found in over 2500 patients.  They tried to improve on the 1988 [4] and 1994 CDC criteria.  They suggested a list of symptoms that could be used to strengthen the ability to select ME/CFS patients.  Many of the symptoms they mentioned are not in the CDC CFS Symptom Inventory.  So to claim that the &quot;CDC Symptom Inventory assesses the full range of CFS associated symptoms&quot; seems questionable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be interesting if in future these symptoms (that De Becker et al were suggesting) were added before statistical analyses are performed.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The fatigue criteria and functional impairment criteria have become much less restrictive [5].  For example, to satisfy the fatigue criteria, the fatigue is required to be greater than or equal to the medians of the MFI general fatigue (&amp;#8805; 13) or reduced activity (&amp;#8805; 10) scales.   So it now seems particularly important that the symptom criteria have good sensitivity and specificity or one is going to end up with a definition that leads to very heterogeneous samples.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tom Kindlon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[1] Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A: The chronic fatigue syndrome; a comprehensive approach to its definition and study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ann Int Med 1994, 121:953-959.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[2] Reeves WC, Lloyd A, Vernon SD, Klimas N, Jason LA, Bleijenberg G, Evengard B, White PD, Nisenbaum R, Unger ER, International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group: Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BMC Health Services Research 2003, 3:25.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-25&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[3] A definition-based analysis of symptoms in a large cohort of patients with&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;chronic fatigue syndrome, P. De Becker, N. McGregor, and K. De Meirleir.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Journal of Internal Medicine 2001;250:234-240&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[4] Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM, Komaroff AL, Schonberger LB, Straus SE, et al.: Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 1988, 108:387-389.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[5] Reeves WC, Wagner D, Nisenbaum R, Jones JF, Gurbaxani B, Solomon L, Papanicolaou DA,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unger ER, Vernon SD, Heim C: Chronic fatigue syndrome &amp;#8212; a clinically empirical approach&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to its definition and study. BMC Medicine 2005, 3:16.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <dc:creator>Tom Kindlon</dc:creator>
                <dc:date>2007-06-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
