<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Population Health Metrics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Population Health Metrics</description>
        <dc:date>2009-06-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/11">
        <title>Mortality attributable to excess adiposity in England and Wales in 2003 and 2015: explorations with a spreadsheet implementation of the Comparative Risk Assessment methodology</title>
        <description>Background:
The aim was to estimate the burden of fatal disease attributable to excess adiposity in England and Wales in 2003 and 2015 and to explore the sensitivity of the estimates to the assumptions and methods used.
Methods:
A spreadsheet implementation of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) methodology for continuously distributed exposures was used. For our base case, adiposity-related risks were assumed to be minimal with a mean (SD) BMI of 21 (1) Kg m-2. All cause mortality risks for 2015 were taken from the Government Actuary and alternative compositions by cause derived. Disease specific relative risks by BMI were taken from the CRA project and varied in sensitivity analyses.
Results:
Under base case methods and assumptions for 2003 approximately 41,000 deaths and a loss of 1.05 years of life expectancy were attributed to excess adiposity. Seventy-seven percent of all diabetic deaths, 23% of all ischaemic heart disease deaths and 14% of all cerebrovascular disease deaths were attributed to excess adiposity. Predictions for 2015 were found to be more sensitive to assumptions about the future course of mortality risks for diabetes than to variation in the assumed trend in BMI. On less favourable assumptions the attributable loss of life expectancy in 2015 would rise modestly to 1.28 years.
Conclusions:
Excess adiposity appears to contribute materially but modestly to mortality risks in England and Wales and this contribution is likely to increase in the future. Uncertainty centres on future trends of associated diseases, especially diabetes. The robustness of these estimates is limited by the lack of control for correlated risks by stratification and by the empirical uncertainty surrounding the effects of prolonged excess adiposity beginning before adulthood.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Kelly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nora Pashayan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sreetharan Munisamy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Powles</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/10">
        <title>Ethnic differences of cancer incidence in Estonia: two cross-sectional unlinked census based cancer incidence analyses</title>
        <description>Background:
Estonian and Russian ethnic groups in Estonia differ from one another in several aspects such as historic and socio-economic background, language and culture. The aim of the current study was to examine ethnic differences in cancer incidence in Estonia, and to compare the situation before and after the profound political and economical changes in early 1990s.
Methods:
Two cross-sectional unlinked census based cancer incidence analyses were performed. Cancer incidence data were obtained from the Estonian Cancer Registry. Population denominators came from the population censuses of 1989 and 2000. Standardised cancer incidence rates were calculated for men and women for the aggregate periods 1988-1990 and 1999-2000. The absolute differences in standardised cancer incidence rates for Estonians and Russians together with standard errors and p-values for SE-s in 1989 and 2000 were evaluated for both sexes. Differences in cancer incidence between Estonians and Russians in 1989 and 2000 were estimated for both sexes, using standardised rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
Between 1988-1990 and 1999-2000, the total cancer incidence in Estonian men increased while in Russian men it decreased. The rates for stomach and lung cancer declined for both ethnic groups, whereas the decline for Russian men was larger compared to Estonian men, especially for lung cancer. Cancer incidence in women increased for both ethnic groups from 1988-1990 to 1999-2000. Most importantly this change was caused by the increased incidence of breast cancer, which was more pronounced in Estonian women.
Conclusions:
The Russians in Estonia have an excess cancer rate for a number of sites, and the differences are more pronounced in men. A constant finding is the excess of stomach cancer in Russians for both sexes. Some of the differences in cancer rates between the Estonians and Russians in Estonia are likely to be attributable to variation in exposure to specific etiologic factors that are caused by differences in lifestyle, such as diet, smoking and drinking habits. However some of changes over time may be due to differential migration. Further research to understand these ethnic differences in cancer incidence is warranted.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Katrin Lang</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/9">
        <title>The burden of disease and injury in Iran 2003</title>
        <description>Background:
The objective of this study was to estimate the burden of disease and injury in Iran for the year 2003, using Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) at the national level and for six selected provinces.
Methods:
Methods developed by the World Health Organization for National Burden of Disease (NBD) studies were applied to estimate disease and injury incidence for the calculation of Years of Life Lost due to premature mortality (YLL), Years Lived with Disability (YLD), and DALYs. The following adjustments of the NBD methodology were made in this study: a revised list with 214 disease and injury causes, development of new and more specific disease modeling templates for cancers and injuries, and adjustment for dependent comorbidity. We compared the results with World Health Organization (WHO) estimates for Eastern Mediterranean Region, sub-region B in 2002.
Results:
We estimated that in the year 2003, there were 21,572 DALYs due to all diseases and injuries per 100,000 Iranian people of all ages and both sexes. From this total number of DALYs, 62% were due to disability premature deaths (YLD) and 38% were due to premature deaths (YLL); 58% were due to noncommunicable diseases, 28% - to injuries, and 14% - to communicable, maternal, perinatal, and nutritional conditions. Fifty-three percent of the total number of 14.349 million DALYs in Iran were in males, with 36.5% of the total due to intentional and unintentional injuries, 15% due to mental and behavioral disorders, and 10% due to circulatory system diseases; and 47% of DALYs were in females, with 18% of the total due to mental and behavioral disorders, 18% due to intentional and unintentional injuries, and 12% due to circulatory system diseases. The disease and injury causes leading to the highest number of DALYs in males were road traffic accidents (1.071 million), natural disasters (548 thousand), opioid use (510 thousand), and ischemic heart disease (434 thousand). The leading causes of DALYs in females were ischemic heart disease (438 thousand), major depressive disorder (420 thousand), natural disasters (419 thousand), and road traffic accidents (235 thousand). The burden of disease at the province level showed marked variability. DALY estimates by Iran&apos;s NBD study were higher than those for EMR-B by WHO.
Conclusions:
The health and disease profile in Iran has made the transition from the dominance of communicable diseases to that of noncommunicable diseases and road traffic injuries. NBD results are to be used in health program planning, research, and resource allocation generation policies and practices.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Mohsen Naghavi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Farid Abolhassani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Farshad Pourmalek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maziar Moradi Lakeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nahid Jafari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sanaz Vaseghi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Niloufar Mahdavi Hezaveh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hossein Kazemeini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/8">
        <title>An average / deprivation / inequality (ADI) analysis of chronic disease outcomes and risk factors in Argentina </title>
        <description>Background:
Recognition of the global economic and epidemiological burden of chronic non-communicable diseases has increased in recent years. However, much of the research on this issue remains focused on individual-level risk factors and neglects the underlying social patterning of risk factors and disease outcomes.
Methods:
Secondary analysis of Argentina&apos;s 2005 Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo (National Risk Factor Survey, N = 41,392) using a novel analytical strategy first proposed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which we here refer to as the Average/Deprivation/Inequality (ADI) framework. The analysis focuses on two risk factors (unhealthy diet and obesity) and one related disease outcome (diabetes), a notable health concern in Latin America. Logistic regression is used to examine the interplay between socioeconomic and demographic factors. The ADI analysis then uses the results from the logistic regression to identify the most deprived, the best-off, and the difference between the two ideal types.
Results:
Overall, 19.9% of the sample reported being in poor/fair health, 35.3% reported not eating any fruits or vegetables in five days of the week preceding the interview, 14.7% had a BMI of 30 or greater, and 8.5% indicated that a health professional had told them that they have diabetes or high blood pressure. However, significant variation is hidden by these summary measures. Educational attainment displayed the strongest explanatory power throughout the models, followed by household income, with both factors highlighting the social patterning of risk factors and disease outcomes. As educational attainment and household income increase, the probability of poor health, unhealthy diet, obesity, and diabetes decrease. The analyses also point toward important provincial effects and reinforce the notion that both compositional factors (i.e., characteristics of individuals) and contextual factors (i.e., characteristics of places) are important in understanding the social patterning of chronic diseases.
Conclusion:
The application of the ADI framework enables identification of the regions or groups worst-off for each outcome measure under study. This can be used to highlight the variation embedded within national averages; as such, it encourages a social perspective on population health indicators that is particularly attuned to issues of inequity. The ADI framework is an important tool in the evaluation of policies aiming to prevent or control chronic non-communicable diseases.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Fernando De Maio</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruno Linetzky</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mario Virgolini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/7">
        <title>Estimating the incidence of lung cancer attributable to occupational exposure in Iran</title>
        <description>ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to estimate the fraction of lung cancer incidence in Iran attributed to occupational exposures to the well-established lung cancer carcinogens, including silica, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, chromium, diesel fumes, beryllium, and asbestos.
Methods:
Nationwide exposure to each of the mentioned carcinogens was estimated using workforce data from the Iranian population census of 1995, available from the International Labor Organization (ILO) website. The prevalence of exposure to carcinogens in each industry was estimated using exposure data from the CAREX (CARcinogen EXposure) database, an international occupational carcinogen information system kept and maintained by the European Union. The magnitude of the relative risk of lung cancer for each carcinogen was estimated from local and international literature. Using the Levin modified population attributable risk (incidence) fraction, lung cancer incidence (as estimated by the Tehran Population-Based Cancer Registry) attributable to workplace exposure to carcinogens was estimated.
Results:
The total workforce in Iran according to the 1995 census identified 12,488,020 men and 677,469 women. Agriculture is the largest sector with 25% of the male and 0.27% of female workforce. After applying the CAREX exposure estimate to each sector, the proportion exposed to lung carcinogens was 0.08% for male workers and 0.02% for female workers. Estimating a relative risk of 1.9 (95% CI of 1.7&#8211;2.1) for high exposure and 1.3 (95% CI 1.2&#8211;1.4) for low exposure, and employing the Levin modified formula, the fraction of lung cancer attributed to carcinogens in the workplace was 1.5% (95% CI of 1.2&#8211;1.9) for females and 12% (95% CI of 10&#8211;15) for males. These fractions correspond to an estimated incidence of 1.3 and 0.08 cases of lung cancer per 100,000 population for males and females, respectively.
Conclusion:
The incidence of lung cancer due to occupational exposure is low in Iran and, as in other countries, more lung cancer is due to occupational exposure among males than females.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammadali Mohagheghi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bita Kalaghchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yasaman Mousavi-Jarrahi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Kazem Noori</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/6">
        <title>Assessing the repeatability of verbal autopsy for determining cause of death: two case studies among women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso and Indonesia</title>
        <description>Background:
Verbal autopsy (VA) is an established tool for assessing cause-specific mortality patterns in communities where deaths are not routinely medically certified, and is an important source of data on deaths among the poorer half of the world&apos;s population. However, the repeatability of the VA process has never been investigated, even though it is an important factor in its overall validity. This study analyses repeatability in terms of the overall VA process (from interview to cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMF)), as well as specifically for interview material and individual causes of death, using data from Burkina Faso and Indonesia.
Methods:
Two series of repeated VA interviews relating to women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso (n = 91) and Indonesia (n = 116) were analysed for repeatability in terms of interview material, individual causes of death and CSMFs. All the VA data were interpreted using the InterVA-M model, which provides 100% intrinsic repeatability for interpretation, and thus eliminated the need to consider variations or repeatability in physician coding.
Results:
The repeatability of the overall VA process from interview to CSMFs was good in both countries. Repeatability was moderate in the interview material, and lower in terms of individual causes of death. Burkinab&#233; data were less repeatable than Indonesian, and repeatability also declined with longer recall periods between the death and interview, particularly after two years.
Conclusion:
While these analyses do not address the validity of the VA process in absolute terms, repeatability is a prerequisite for intrinsic validity. This study thus adds new understanding to the quest for reliable cause of death assessment in communities lacking routine medical certification of deaths, and confirms the status of VA as an important and reliable tool at the community level, but perhaps less so at the individual level.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Peter Byass</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucia D'Ambruoso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Moctar Ouedraogo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>S Qomariyah</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/5">
        <title>Multiple primary tumours: incidence estimation in the presence of competing risks</title>
        <description>Background:
Estimating the risk of developing subsequent primary tumours in a population is difficult since the occurrence probability is conditioned to the survival probability.
Methods:
We proposed to apply Markov models studying the transition intensities from first to second tumour with the Aalen-Johansen (AJ) estimators, as usually done in competing risk models. In a simulation study we applied the proposed method in different settings with constant or varying underlying intensities and applying age standardisation. In addition, we illustrated the method with data on breast cancer from the Piedmont Cancer Registry.
Results:
The simulation study showed that the person-years approach led to a sensibly wider bias than the AJ estimators. The largest bias was observed assuming constantly increasing incidence rates. However, this situation is rather uncommon dealing with subsequent tumours incidence. In 9233 cases with breast cancer occurred in women resident in Turin, Italy, between 1985 and 1998 we observed a significant increased risk of 1.91 for subsequent cancer of corpus uteri, estimated with the age-standardised Aalen-Johansen incidence ratio (AJ-IRstand), and a significant increased risk of 1.29 for cancer possibly related to the radiotherapy of breast cancer. The peak of occurrence of those cancers was observed after 8 years of follow-up.
Conclusion:
The increased risk of a cancer of the corpus uteri, also observed in other studies, is usually interpreted as the common shared risk factors such as low parity, early menarche and late onset of menopause. We also grouped together those cancers possibly associated to a previous local radiotherapy: the cumulative risk at 14 years is still not significant, however the AJ estimators showed a significant risk peak between the eighth and the ninth year. Finally, the proposed approach has been shown to be reliable and informative under several aspects. It allowed for a correct estimation of the risk, and for investigating the time trend of the subsequent cancer occurrence.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Rosso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lea Terracini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fulvio Ricceri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roberto Zanetti</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/4">
        <title>Calculation of Health Expectancies with Administrative Data for North Rhine-Westphalia, a Federal State of Germany, 1999-2005</title>
        <description>ObjectivesThe main objectives of this study were to prove the feasibility of health expectancy analyses with regional administrative health statistics and to explore the utility of the calculated health expectancies in describing the health state of the population living in North Rhine-Westphalia, a Federal State of Germany.Materials and methodsAdministrative population and mortality data as well as health data on disability and long-term care provided by public services were used to calculate: a) the life expectancy and b) the health expectancies Severe-Disability-Free Life Expectancy (SDFLE) and Long-Term-Care-Free Life Expectancy (LTCFLE) from 1999 to 2005. Calculations were done using the Sullivan method.
Results:
SDFLE at birth was 69.9 years (males 66.2 and females 73.2 years) in 1999 and it increased to 71.7 years (males 68.6 and females 74.7 years) in 2005. The proportion of the SDFLE on the total life expectancy at birth was 89.8% (males 88.6 and females 90.8%) in 1999 and 90.7% (males 89.8 and females 91.4%) in 2005.LTCFLE at birth was 75.3 years (males 73.1 and females 77.5 years) in 1999 and it increased to 76.6 years (males 74.7 and females 78.6 years) in 2005. The proportion of the LTCFLE on the total life expectancy at birth was 96.8% (males 97.8 and females 96.1%) in 1999 and 96.8% (males 97.8 and females 96.2%) in 2005.Discussion and conclusionBoth health expectancies indicate an improvement in the quantity as well as in the quality of healthy life for the population living in North Rhine Westphalia and therefore suggest a compression of morbidity from 1999 to 2005. The findings however have several limitations in their sensitivity, since we applied dichotomous valuations to the health states. In addition, the results are restricted to comparisons over time because the morbidity concepts do not allow for comparisons with populations other than the German one. Refined calculations with other summary measures of population health and with health data on other morbidity concepts are therefore reasonable.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Paulo Pinheiro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Kramer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/3">
        <title>The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation
</title>
        <description>Background:
To present an episodic random utility model that unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation.
Methods:
First, we introduce two alternative random utility models (RUMs) for health preferences: the episodic RUM and the more common instant RUM. For the interpretation of time trade-off (TTO) responses, we show that the episodic model implies a coefficient estimator, and the instant model implies a mean slope estimator. Secondly, we demonstrate these estimators and the differences between the estimates for 42 health states using TTO responses from the seminal Measurement and Valuation in Health (MVH) study conducted in the United Kingdom. Mean slopes are estimates with and without Dolan&apos;s transformation of worse-than-death (WTD) responses. Finally, we demonstrate an exploded probit estimator, an extension of the coefficient estimator for discrete choice data that accommodates both TTO and rank responses.
Results:
By construction, mean slopes are less than or equal to coefficients, because slopes are fractions and, therefore, magnify downward errors in WTD responses. The Dolan transformation of WTD responses causes mean slopes to increase in similarity to coefficient estimates, yet they are not equivalent (i.e., absolute mean difference = 0.179). Unlike mean slopes, coefficient estimates demonstrate strong concordance with rank-based predictions (Lin&apos;s rho = 0.91). Combining TTO and rank responses under the exploded probit model improves the identification of health state values, decreasing the average width of confidence intervals from 0.057 to 0.041 compared to TTO only results.
Conclusion:
The episodic RUM expands upon the theoretical framework underlying health state valuation and contributes to health econometrics by motivating the selection of coefficient and exploded probit estimators for the analysis of TTO and rank responses. In future MVH surveys, sample size requirements may be reduced through the incorporation of multiple responses under a single estimator.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Craig</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Busschbach</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976-2002</title>
        <description>Background:
Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) show a larger-than-expected increase in mean BMI between 1996 and 1997. Proxy-reports of height and weight were discontinued as part of the 1997 NHIS redesign, suggesting that the sharp increase between 1996 and 1997 may be artifactual.
Methods:
We merged NHIS data from 1976&#8211;2002 into a single database consisting of approximately 1.7 million adults aged 18 and over. The analysis consisted of two parts: First, we estimated the magnitude of BMI differences by reporting status (i.e., self-reported versus proxy-reported height and weight). Second, we developed a procedure to correct biases in BMI introduced by reporting status.
Results:
Our analyses confirmed that proxy-reports of weight tended to be biased downward, with the degree of bias varying by race, sex, and other characteristics. We developed a correction procedure to minimize BMI underestimation associated with proxy-reporting, substantially reducing the larger-than-expected increase found in NHIS data between 1996 and 1997.
Conclusion:
It is imperative that researchers who use reported estimates of height and weight think carefully about flaws in their data and how existing correction procedures might fail to account for them. The development of this particular correction procedure represents an important step toward improving the quality of BMI estimates in a widely used source of epidemiologic data.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Eric Reither</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Utz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2009, 7:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
