<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Population Health Metrics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Population Health Metrics</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/21" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/6">
        <title>Age of onset in chronic diseases: new method and application to dementia in Germany</title>
        <description>Background:
Age of onset is an important outcome to characterize a population with a chronic disease. With respect to social, cognitive, and physical aspects for patients and families, dementia is especially burdensome. In Germany, like in many other countries, it is highly prevalent in the older population and imposes enormous efforts for caregivers and society.
Methods:
We develop an incidence-prevalence-mortality model to derive the mean and variance of the age of onset in chronic diseases. Age- and sex-specific incidence and prevalence of dementia is taken from published values based on health insurance data from 2002. Data about the age distribution in Germany in 2002 comes from the Federal Statistical Office.
Results:
Mean age of onset of a chronic disease depends on a) the age-specific incidence of the disease, b) the prevalence of the disease, and c) the age distribution of the population. The resulting age of onset of dementia in Germany in 2002 is 78.8 +/- 8.1 years (mean +/- standard deviation) for men and 81.9 +/- 7.6 years for women.
Conclusions:
Although incidence and prevalence of dementia in men are not greater than in women, men contract dementia approximately three years earlier than women. The reason lies in the different age distributions of the male and the female population in Germany.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Ralph Brinks</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Landwehr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Regina Waldeyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2013, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-11-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/5">
        <title>Mortality following the Haitian earthquake of 2010: a stratified cluster survey</title>
        <description>IntroductionResearch that seeks to better understand vulnerability to earthquakes and risk factors associated with mortality in low resource settings is critical to earthquake preparedness and response efforts. This study aims to characterize mortality and associated risk factors in the 2010 Haitian earthquake.
Methods:
In January 2011, a survey of the earthquake affected Haitian population was conducted in metropolitan Port-au-Prince. A stratified 60x20 cluster design (n&#8201;=&#8201;1200 households) was used with 30 clusters sampled in both camp and neighborhood locations. Households were surveyed regarding earthquake impact, current living conditions, and unmet needs.
Results:
Mortality was estimated at 24 deaths (confidence interval [CI]: 20&#8211;28) per 1,000 in the sample population. Using two approaches, extrapolation of the survey mortality rate to the exposed population yielded mortality estimates ranging from a low of 49,033 to a high of 86,555. No significant difference in mortality was observed by sex (p&#8201;=&#8201;.786); however, age was significant with adults age 50+ years facing increased mortality risk. Odds of death were not significantly higher in camps, with 27 deaths per 1,000 (CI: 22&#8211;34), compared to neighborhoods, where the death rate was 19 per 1,000 (CI: 15&#8211;25; p&#8201;=&#8201;0.080). Crowding and residence in a multistory building were also associated with increased risk of death.
Conclusions:
Haiti earthquake mortality estimates are widely varied, though epidemiologic surveys conducted to date suggest lower levels of mortality than officially reported figures. Strategies to mitigate future mortality burden in future earthquakes should consider improvements to the built environment that are feasible in urban resource-poor settings.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Doocy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Megan Cherewick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Kirsch</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2013, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-11-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/4">
        <title>Association of blood lipids, creatinine, albumin, and CRP with socioeconomic status in Malawi</title>
        <description>Background:
The objective of this analysis is to document the relationship between biomarker-based indicators of health and socioeconomic status (SES) in a low-income African population where the cumulative effects of exposure to multiple stressors on physiological functions and health in general are expected to be highly detrimental for the well-being of individuals.
Methods:
Biomarkers were collected subsequent to the 2008 round of the Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH), a population-based study in rural Malawi, including blood lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, ratio of total cholesterol to HDL), biomarkers of renal and liver organ function (albumin and creatinine) and wide-range C-reactive protein (CRP) as a non-specific biomarker for inflammation. These biomarkers represent widely used indicators of health that are individually or cumulatively recognized as risk factors for age-related diseases among prime-aged and elderly individuals. Quantile regressions are used to estimate the age-gradient and the within-day variation of each biomarker distribution. Differences in biomarker levels by socioeconomic status are investigated using descriptive and multivariate statistics.
Results:
Overall, the number of significant associations between the biomarkers and socioeconomic measures is very modest. None of the biomarkers significantly varies with schooling. Except for CRP where being married is weakly associated with lower risk of having an elevated CRP level, marriage is not associated with the biomarkers measured in the MLSFH. Similarly, being Muslim is associated with a lower risk of having elevated CRP, but otherwise religion does not predict being in the high-risk quartiles of any of the MLSFH biomarkers. Wealth does not predict being in the high-risk quartile of any of the MLSFH biomarkers, with the exception of a weak effect on creatinine. Being overweight or obese is associated with increased likelihood of being in the high-risk quartile for cholesterol, Chol/HDL ratio, and LDL.
Conclusions:
The results provide only weak evidence for variation of the biomarkers by socioeconomic indicators in a poor Malawian context. Our findings underscore the need for further research to understand the determinants of health outcomes in a poor low-income context such as rural Malawi.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Iliana Kohler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beth Soldo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philip Anglewicz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ben Chilima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Peter Kohler</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2013, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-11-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/3">
        <title>Mortality and excess risk in US adults with pre-diabetes and diabetes: a comparison of two nationally representative cohorts, 1988&#191;2006</title>
        <description>Background:
There is strong evidence on the efficacy of behavioral modification and treatment for reducing diabetes incidence and diabetes-related morbidity and mortality in persons with pre-diabetes and diabetes. But the extent to which the evidence has translated into gains in health in these population sub-groups in the US is unclear. Monitoring national diabetes-related mortality levels over time is important for evaluating the effectiveness of the US health system response to diabetes.
Methods:
We identified individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes using Hemoglobin A1c. Two consecutive periods for investigating differences in mortality according to categories of glycemia were derived using nationally representative survey data on US adults ages 35&#8211;74 from subsequent rounds of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988&#8211;1994 and 1999&#8211;2002). Age-standardized mortality rates were calculated for individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes and proportional hazards models were used to assess change in the relative risks of dysglycemia (pre-diabetes and diabetes) adjusting for multiple confounding factors.
Results:
Age-standardized mortality rates in individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes showed no statistically significant change between 1988&#8211;2001 and 1999&#8211;2006. In individuals with pre-diabetes, mortality rates were 11.19 and 14.02 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the early and later period, respectively. The corresponding values for individuals with diabetes were 20.34 and 20.82 deaths per 1,000 person-years. In contrast, the absolute level of mortality in the normo-glycemic population declined significantly between 1988&#8211;2001 and 1999&#8211;2006 (7.81 to 6.04; p for difference&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05). Adjusting for social and demographic variables, smoking and body mass index in a multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio of dysglycemia increased from 1.62 (95% CI: 1.36&#8211;1.93) in 1988&#8211;2001 to 2.36 (95% CI: 1.70&#8211;3.27) in 1999&#8211;2006 (p for difference&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05).
Conclusions:
We find no evidence of declines in excess mortality in persons with dysglycemia between 1988&#8211;2001 and 1999&#8211;2006, a result that was robust to adjustment for social and demographic variables, smoking and body mass index. In the context of long-term secular declines in mortality in the US population, our findings suggest that individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes should be an important focus of future interventions aimed at improving population health in the US.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Stokes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Neil Mehta</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2013, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-11-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/2">
        <title>Mortality in an Aboriginal Medical Service (Redfern) cohort</title>
        <description>Background:
Published estimates of Aboriginal mortality and life expectancy (LE) for the eastern Australian states are derived from demographic modelling techniques to estimate the population and extent of under-recording of Aboriginality in death registration. No reliable empirical information on Aboriginal mortality and LE exists for New South Wales (NSW), the most populous Australian state in which 29% of Aboriginal people reside.This paper estimates mortality and LE in a large, mainly metropolitan cohort of Aboriginal clients from the Aboriginal Medical Service (AMS) Redfern, Sydney, NSW.
Methods:
Identifying information from patient records accrued by the AMS Redfern since 1980 of definitely Aboriginal clients, without distinction between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (n=24,035), was extracted and linked to the National Death Index (NDI) at the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Age-specific mortality rates and LEs for each sex were estimated using the AMS patient population as the denominator, discounted for deaths. Directly age-standardised mortality and LEs were estimated for 1995&#8211;1999, 2000&#8211;2004 and 2005&#8211;2009, along with 95% confidence intervals. Comparisons were made with other estimates of Aboriginal mortality and LE and with the total Australian population.
Results:
Mortality declined in the AMS Redfern cohort over 1995&#8211;2009, and the decline occurred mostly in the &#8804;44&#160;year age range. Male LE at birth was estimated to be 64.4&#160;years (95%CI:62.6-66.1) in 1995&#8211;1999, 65.6&#160;years (95%CI:64.1-67.1) in 2000&#8211;2004, and 67.6&#160;years (95%CI:65.9-69.2) for 2005&#8211;2009. In females, these LE estimates were 69.6 (95%CI:68.0-71.2), 71.1 (95%CI:69.9-72.4), and 71.4 (95%CI:70.0-72.8) years. LE in the AMS cohort was 11&#160;years lower for males and 12&#160;years lower for females than corresponding all-Australia LEs for the same periods. These were similar to estimates for Australian Aboriginal people overall for the same period by the Aboriginal Burden of Disease for 2009, using the General Growth Balance (GGB) model approach, and by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for 2005&#8211;2007. LE in the AMS cohort was somewhat lower than these estimates for NSW Aboriginal people, and higher than ABS 2005&#8211;2007 estimates for Aboriginal people from Northern Territory, South Australia, and Western Australia.
Conclusions:
The AMS Redfern cohort has provided the first empirically based estimates of mortality and LE trends in a large sample of Aboriginal people from NSW.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Morrell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bronwen Phillips</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Taylor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Daniels</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kate Burgess</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naomi Mayers</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2013, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-11-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/1">
        <title>Decomposing the Indigenous life expectancy gap by risk factors: a life table analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
The estimated gap in life expectancy (LE) between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians was 12 years for men and 10 years for women, whereas the Northern Territory Indigenous LE gap was at least 50% greater than the national figures. This study aims to explain the Indigenous LE gap by common modifiable risk factors.
Methods:
This study covered the period from 1986 to 2005. Unit record death data from the Northern Territory were used to assess the differences in LE at birth between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations by socioeconomic disadvantage, smoking, alcohol abuse, obesity, pollution, and intimate partner violence. The population attributable fractions were applied to estimate the numbers of deaths associated with the selected risks. The standard life table and cause decomposition technique was used to examine the individual and joint effects on health inequality.
Results:
The findings from this study indicate that among the selected risk factors, socioeconomic disadvantage was the leading health risk and accounted for one-third to one-half of the Indigenous LE gap. A combination of all six selected risks explained over 60% of the Indigenous LE gap.
Conclusions:
Improving socioeconomic status, smoking cessation, and overweight reduction are critical to closing the Indigenous LE gap. This paper presents a useful way to explain the impact of risk factors of health inequalities, and suggests that reducing poverty should be placed squarely at the centre of the strategies to close the Indigenous LE gap.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/11/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Yuejen Zhao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jo Wright</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Begg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Guthridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2013, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-01-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-11-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-01-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/24">
        <title>Household food access and child malnutrition: Results from the eight-country MAL-ED study</title>
        <description>Background:
Stunting results from decreased food intake, poor diet quality, and a high burden of early childhood infections, and contributes to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although food insecurity is an important determinant of child nutrition, including stunting, development of universal measures has been challenging due to cumbersome nutritional questionnaires and concerns about lack of comparability across populations. We investigate the relationship between household food access, one component of food security, and indicators of nutritional status in early childhood across eight country sites.
Methods:
We administered a socioeconomic survey to 800 households in research sites in eight countries, including a recently validated nine-item food access insecurity questionnaire, and obtained anthropometric measurements from children aged 24 to 60 months. We used multivariable regression models to assess the relationship between household food access insecurity and anthropometry in children, and we assessed the invariance of that relationship across country sites.
Results:
Average age of study children was 41 months. Mean food access insecurity score (range: 0&#8211;27) was 5.8, and varied from 2.4 in Nepal to 8.3 in Pakistan. Across sites, the prevalence of stunting (42%) was much higher than the prevalence of wasting (6%). In pooled regression analyses, a 10-point increase in food access insecurity score was associated with a 0.20 SD decrease in height-for-age Z score (95% CI 0.05 to 0.34 SD; p&#8201;=&#8201;0.008). A likelihood ratio test for heterogeneity revealed that this relationship was consistent across countries (p&#8201;=&#8201;0.17).
Conclusions:
Our study provides evidence of the validity of using a simple household food access insecurity score to investigate the etiology of childhood growth faltering across diverse geographic settings. Such a measure could be used to direct interventions by identifying children at risk of illness and death related to malnutrition.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Stephanie Psaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zulfiqar Bhutta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tahmeed Ahmed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shamsir Ahmed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pascal Bessong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Munirul Islam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sushil John</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margaret Kosek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aldo Lima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cebisa Nesamvuni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Prakash Shrestha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Erling Svensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica McGrath</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephanie Richard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jessica Seidman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Caulfield</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Miller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Checkley</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2012, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-12-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-10-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-10-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-12-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/23">
        <title>Looking at the smoking epidemic through the lens of population pyramids: sociodemographic patterns of smoking in Italy, 1983 to 2005</title>
        <description>Background:
Surveillance systems often present data by means of summary measures, like age-standardised rates. In this study, we aimed at comparing information derived from commonly used measures of smoking with that presented in modified population pyramids (PPs), using the example of the diffusion of smoking in Italy over the past two decades.
Methods:
Data were derived from four National Health Interview Surveys carried out in 1983, 1990 to 1991, 1999 to 2000, and 2004 to 2005. After computing both age-specific and age-standardised rates of current, former, and never smoking, we constructed modified PPs by stratifying the male and female populations according to smoking status and educational level.
Results:
Modified PPs showed several features of the smoking epidemic in Italy that were not apparent from conventional surveillance techniques. First, they showed that the population of smokers is aging, with most current smokers in 2005 being males aged 25 to 39 and females aged 40 to 49, whereas in 1983 most smokers belonged to the youngest age groups. Second, they showed that in 2005 most smokers were found among subjects with middle and higher education, whereas two decades earlier most smokers were (male) subjects with the lowest education.
Conclusions:
Modified PPs were able to show how absolute numbers of smokers were distributed by age and sex, how these numbers varied between population subgroups, and how they changed over time. PPs may help provide information on past and future trends in the absolute number of smokers and in their sociodemographic characteristics, which may be missed using only traditional surveillance methods.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Bruno Federico</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giovanni Capelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Costa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johan Mackenbach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anton Kunst</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2012, null:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-11-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-10-23</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-10-23-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-11-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/22">
        <title>National, regional, and global trends in adult overweight and obesity prevalences</title>
        <description>Background:
Overweight and obesity prevalence are commonly used for public and policy communication of the extent of the obesity epidemic, yet comparable estimates of trends in overweight and obesity prevalence by country are not available.
Methods:
We estimated trends between 1980 and 2008 in overweight and obesity prevalence and their uncertainty for adults 20 years of age and older in 199 countries and territories. Data were from a previous study, which used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate mean body mass index (BMI) based on published and unpublished health examination surveys and epidemiologic studies. Here, we used the estimated mean BMIs in a regression model to predict overweight and obesity prevalence by age, country, year, and sex. The uncertainty of the estimates included both those of the Bayesian hierarchical model and the uncertainty due to cross-walking from mean BMI to overweight and obesity prevalence.
Results:
The global age-standardized prevalence of obesity nearly doubled from 6.4% (95% uncertainty interval 5.7-7.2%) in 1980 to 12.0% (11.5-12.5%) in 2008. Half of this rise occurred in the 20 years between 1980 and 2000, and half occurred in the 8 years between 2000 and 2008. The age-standardized prevalence of overweight increased from 24.6% (22.7-26.7%) to 34.4% (33.2-35.5%) during the same 28-year period. In 2008, female obesity prevalence ranged from 1.4% (0.7-2.2%) in Bangladesh and 1.5% (0.9-2.4%) in Madagascar to 70.4% (61.9-78.9%) in Tonga and 74.8% (66.7-82.1%) in Nauru. Male obesity was below 1% in Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Ethiopia, and was highest in Cook Islands (60.1%, 52.6-67.6%) and Nauru (67.9%, 60.5-75.0%).
Conclusions:
Globally, the prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased since 1980, and the increase has accelerated. Although obesity increased in most countries, levels and trends varied substantially. These data on trends in overweight and obesity may be used to set targets for obesity prevalence as requested at the United Nations high-level meeting on Prevention and Control of NCDs.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Gretchen Stevens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gitanjali Singh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuan Lu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Goodarz Danaei</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Lin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mariel Finucane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adil Bahalim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Russell McIntire</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hialy Gutierrez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melanie Cowan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Paciorek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Farshad Farzadfar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leanne Riley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Majid Ezzati</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2012, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-11-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-10-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-10-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-11-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/21">
        <title>Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years</title>
        <description>ObjectiveTo systematically review the methodology of general burden of disease studies. Three key questions were addressed: 1) what was the quality of the data, 2) which methodological choices were made to calculate disability adjusted life years (DALYs), and 3) were uncertainty and risk factor analyses performed? Furthermore, DALY outcomes of the included studies were compared.
Methods:
Burden of disease studies (1990 to 2011) in international peer-reviewed journals and in grey literature were identified with main inclusion criteria being multiple-cause studies that quantified the burden of disease as the sum of the burden of all distinct diseases expressed in DALYs. Electronic database searches included Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science. Studies were collated by study population, design, methods used to measure mortality and morbidity, risk factor analyses, and evaluation of results.
Results:
Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria of our review. Overall, studies followed the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) approach. However, considerable variation existed in disability weights, discounting, age-weighting, and adjustments for uncertainty. Few studies reported whether mortality data were corrected for missing data or underreporting. Comparison with the GBD DALY outcomes by country revealed that for some studies DALY estimates were of similar magnitude; others reported DALY estimates that were two times higher or lower.
Conclusions:
Overcoming &#8220;error&#8221; variation due to the use of different methodologies and low-quality data is a critical priority for advancing burden of disease studies. This can enlarge the detection of true variation in DALY outcomes between populations or over time.</description>
        <link>http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/10/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Suzanne Polinder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juanita Haagsma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudia Stein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arie Havelaar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Population Health Metrics 2012, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-7954-10-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1478-7954-10-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Population Health Metrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1478-7954</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-11-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
