Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Garfield |
| 24 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Degomme |
| 18 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudine Prudhon |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudine Prudhon |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Garfield |
| 12 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Degomme |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 4 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudine Prudhon |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-9-57 |
You can find further information about peer review here.